De Zerbi's Fury After Tottenham's Defeat to Aston Villa
Roberto De Zerbi did not wait for the inquest. At full time of Tottenham’s 3-2 home defeat by Aston Villa, he went straight down the tunnel, leaving the boos to pour down behind him and the league table to tell its own story: no Premier League wins, just two points, and now a three‑week international break to stew on it.
When he did speak, he did not hold back.
“I am very disappointed, sad and frustrated for the performance,” the Italian said. “We can’t lose the game in this way, we can’t concede the second goal, we can’t lose balance just because we are losing.”
This was not just about tactics. De Zerbi turned on his players’ mentality and their physical condition, and even admitted that his own change from the bench had hurt the team. Mohammed Kudus, introduced as a substitute, “disrupted the balance” of the side, the head coach said.
He had tried to warn them. Early in the second half, with Tottenham ahead and the game still in their hands, De Zerbi gathered his forwards.
“I spoke with our four attackers in minute 51, I asked them to use their head,” he said. “All second half I was telling people to be calm. But the second goal was incredible.”
That second Villa goal, scored by Jackson in the 67th minute, came from a route Tottenham knew was coming. The forward raced on to a booming kick from the outstanding Zion Suzuki, punishing a defence that had simply switched off.
De Zerbi was furious because this was no surprise weapon.
“We knew this season Aston Villa are playing 86% more long balls than last season and we spoke in many meetings about it,” he said. The numbers were clear, the plan was clear. The response on the pitch was not.
The pattern, in his eyes, is becoming dangerous. “Now we have to explain another game like [the home defeat against] Newcastle where we played the first half well, got to 60 minutes OK, and then we lose.”
Tottenham again started with control, again reached the hour mark in reasonable shape, and again unravelled when the pressure rose. For a coach who demands structure and clarity, the late-game chaos cut deep.
The timing of the defeat complicates everything. With players now scattering across the globe for international duty, De Zerbi chose silence in the dressing room.
“I didn’t speak with the players today because I didn’t want to say anything,” he admitted. Those heading to their national teams, he said, “have to play and work” there. Those staying behind? “For sure we have to work more because I didn’t like the finish to this game.”
He stopped short of declaring the whole project broken, but the verdict was still damning. “We can’t say everything is bad, but it is not enough.”
While Tottenham’s fans left muttering and jeering, Unai Emery walked away with something very different: Aston Villa’s first Premier League victory of the season and, just as importantly, a performance that looked like the team he has been building.
“The players did well because they believed,” Emery said. Belief, though, was only part of it.
Villa embraced the ugly work. They accepted they would have to suffer without the ball, then trust their structure and their goalkeeper’s long distribution to punch back. Tottenham’s failure to adapt played into their hands.
“We needed to build a team that could play in this way, could defend with resilience and playing with passion when our opponents were attacking,” Emery explained. “We needed defenders, we needed the keeper, we needed everyone committed in that direction.”
They got exactly that. Blocks, headers, big clearances, then the release: Suzuki’s long kicks turning defence into attack, Jackson’s movement stretching a fragile back line.
“We needed to feel strong first, then we could try to play with our structure and our ability,” Emery said. “This is the competitive way.”
For Villa, the win felt like a return to themselves. For De Zerbi and Tottenham, it felt like a warning. How many more times can they “play well to 60 minutes” before the season’s story hardens into something far less forgiving?






